You would think that – following the famous “United Breaks Guitars” PR disaster – United Airlines had invested heavily in social media and reputation management. This weekend’s Twitter meltdown showed that that is apparently not the case.
It all started with three tweets by Shannon Watts:
1) A @united gate agent isn't letting girls in leggings get on flight from Denver to Minneapolis because spandex is not allowed?
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) March 26, 2017
3) Gate agent for flt 215 at 7:55. Said she doesn't make the rules, just follows them. I guess @united not letting women wear athletic wear?
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) March 26, 2017
Watts then added:
A 10-year-old girl in gray leggings. She looked normal and appropriate. Apparently @united is policing the clothing of women and girls. https://t.co/RKsIFoE8pq
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) March 26, 2017
Now, here is the thing: at this point nobody – aside from the people who were at the gate – actually knew what had happened. Is this even true? Nobody who wasn’t there knows, certainly not the social media team. However, rather than sending a soft answer, the United social media team decided to throw the rulebook at Watts:
@shannonrwatts In our Contract of Carriage, Rule 21, we do have the right to refuse transport for passengers who … https://t.co/52kRVgaCyb
— United (@united) March 26, 2017
Let’s take a moment to think about what would have been an appropriate answer by United. I would suggest something like this:
“Thx for getting in touch, Shannon. This seems a bit odd. Let us find out more and get back to you within the next three hours.”
Instead, quoting the Contract of Carriage led to this response:
@united @shannonrwatts Rule 21 implies removal of passenger once aboard carrier. Also, 'properly clothed' isn't defined. Leggings improper? pic.twitter.com/pgp4wLEOSA
— wyatt nerp (@reaganschmagan) March 26, 2017
At this stage, someone should have called someone higher up the food chain. Instead, they studiously repeated their tone-deaf response to everyone who had started to pay attention:
Seems like United's having… quite the morning pic.twitter.com/CQXiVtkDiW
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) March 26, 2017
And Twitter exploded.
By now the issue had started to get the attention of newspapers, tv stations and online media and a United spokesperson clearly had her/his Sunday ruined. However, he/she at least thought to find out what was going on before responding.
Apparently, the girls (three in total) were children of different United employees and flying for free or a reduced fare and United’s rules for these ticket holders include stricter dress rules than for other passengers. Maybe, maybe having that information from the beginning rather than quoting the Contract of Carriage could have stopped this issue from getting out of control. But by now it was too late.
@SarahKSilverman The attire of the teenage pass travelers did not meet our policy for company benefit travel. ^KP
— United (@united) March 26, 2017
@united @SarahKSilverman yeah. They are only trying to treat the teenage daughters of their employees like shit. Not everyone else.
— Seth Rogen (@Sethrogen) March 26, 2017
@PattyArquette Casual attire is allowed as long as it looks neat and is in good taste for the local environment. (1/2)
— United (@united) March 26, 2017
Implying a lack of “good taste for the local environment” might also not have been the best way to refer to the leggings worn by three children.
@united Leggings are business attire for 10 year olds. Their business is being children.
— Patricia Arquette (@PattyArquette) March 26, 2017
Sarah Silverman, Seth Rogen and Patricia Arquette have a combined Twitter following of about 16 million people.
United’s response also instantly triggered more ridicule:
ATTENTION TRAVELERS here is United Airlines new dress code for women. Cp pic.twitter.com/ReZP6F90Uz
— Philanthropit ?? (@RajbarSab) March 26, 2017
Eventually, more people pitched in, including former and current airline industry employees and their dependents. Many of them said they knew that there were dress codes and that they had to follow them when flying on reduced/free tickets.
But you know what? That is not the point: the point is that this issue could have been defused or at least contained very easily if handled differently.
The lessons to learn from this are:
- If you don’t have all the facts, promise to find out more and to get back within a reasonable time frame. Then do so!
- Respond with empathy. Quoting Terms of Service or other legal documents does not make you seem friendly, caring or helpful.
- Empower your social media staff to escalate an issue sooner rather than later.
About twelve hours after the start of this Twitter storm, United wrote a short piece for their website and pinned a tweet linking to it to their profile. Too little, too late.
To our customers…your leggings are welcome! Learn more about our company’s pass travel privilege: https://t.co/5e3euG1H9G.
— United (@united) March 27, 2017
What are your thoughts? Please leave them in the comments section below!