Comments on: Haiti earthquake: The Red Cross Red Crescent social media response http://sm4good.com/2010/01/24/haiti-earthquake-social-media-response/ Exploring the use of Social Media for NGOs, non-profit organizations and to support humanitarian relief Thu, 17 May 2012 13:32:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Vincent Fabris http://sm4good.com/2010/01/24/haiti-earthquake-social-media-response/comment-page-1/#comment-537 Vincent Fabris Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:50:53 +0000 http://sm4good.com/?p=985#comment-537 Hi Timo. That clarifies a lot :) And indeed, those numbers are only for the account holder. Anyway, it is a good case of using Flickr for such a situation... No way that words could have expressed the same emotions. Good article! Regards, Vincent Hi Timo.

That clarifies a lot :) And indeed, those numbers are only for the account holder.

Anyway, it is a good case of using Flickr for such a situation… No way that words could have expressed the same emotions.
Good article!

Regards,

Vincent

]]> By: Timoluege http://sm4good.com/2010/01/24/haiti-earthquake-social-media-response/comment-page-1/#comment-447 Timoluege Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:49:45 +0000 http://sm4good.com/?p=985#comment-447 Just edited my post for clarity and replaced "Our Flickr set generated 1 million page views" with "All photos in our Flickr set combined generated ..." Just edited my post for clarity and replaced "Our Flickr set generated 1 million page views" with "All photos in our Flickr set combined generated …"

]]> By: Timo http://sm4good.com/2010/01/24/haiti-earthquake-social-media-response/comment-page-1/#comment-444 Timo Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:01:33 +0000 http://sm4good.com/?p=985#comment-444 From what I understand the number you are referring to is the number of people who have seen the set itself. It's not the sum of all clicks to the photos. If a photo was highlighted somewhere as a thumbnail and a user clicked on that photo, then he would not be counted for that number. But I agree, it is confusing. The complete stats are only visible to the account holder. According to that, we got 644,863 aggregated views on 14 January and 440,529 on 15 January. It's important to keep in mind that this is views, not visitors. I.e.: One visitor could create ten views if he clicked on ten photos. Does that help? From what I understand the number you are referring to is the number of people who have seen the set itself. It’s not the sum of all clicks to the photos. If a photo was highlighted somewhere as a thumbnail and a user clicked on that photo, then he would not be counted for that number. But I agree, it is confusing.

The complete stats are only visible to the account holder. According to that, we got 644,863 aggregated views on 14 January and 440,529 on 15 January. It’s important to keep in mind that this is views, not visitors. I.e.: One visitor could create ten views if he clicked on ten photos.

Does that help?

]]> By: Vincent Fabris http://sm4good.com/2010/01/24/haiti-earthquake-social-media-response/comment-page-1/#comment-443 Vincent Fabris Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:44:12 +0000 http://sm4good.com/?p=985#comment-443 Hi Timo, Interesting post and a good case of using Flickr. Especially with these disasters a picture can say more then a thousand words. A quick question, i read that the Flickrset generated over a million views in a short while, but when I opened the Flickr set, it showed 458,475 views. Where can I find the 1 million number of views? Regards, Hi Timo,

Interesting post and a good case of using Flickr. Especially with these disasters a picture can say more then a thousand words.

A quick question, i read that the Flickrset generated over a million views in a short while, but when I opened the Flickr set, it showed 458,475 views. Where can I find the 1 million number of views?

Regards,

]]>