<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why &#8220;RSS to Facebook&#8221; is bad for you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sm4good.com/2009/10/06/why-rss-to-facebook-is-bad-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sm4good.com/2009/10/06/why-rss-to-facebook-is-bad-for-you/</link>
	<description>Exploring the use of Social Media for NGOs, non-profit organizations and to support humanitarian relief</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: @louisvillelab</title>
		<link>http://sm4good.com/2009/10/06/why-rss-to-facebook-is-bad-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-34146</link>
		<dc:creator>@louisvillelab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 04:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sm4good.com/?p=418#comment-34146</guid>
		<description>Thanks Timo. I agree with you about not including the rss feeds.____My question for djexo would be why. Why would you want to have your full blog post showing up in your facebook page/ tab? Sometimes we want the latest and greatest and waste precious time. Do your customers want this or is this something you want? Maybe look back on your strategy and analyze the why&#039;s. You might uncover some unmet needs of your users and realize that leaving your blog on your site is fine just the way it is. Look into pulling your customers to your website with useful information and get them on your site where a &quot;buy now&quot; decesion can be made versus having them stay on facebook. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Timo. I agree with you about not including the rss feeds.____My question for djexo would be why. Why would you want to have your full blog post showing up in your facebook page/ tab? Sometimes we want the latest and greatest and waste precious time. Do your customers want this or is this something you want? Maybe look back on your strategy and analyze the why&#039;s. You might uncover some unmet needs of your users and realize that leaving your blog on your site is fine just the way it is. Look into pulling your customers to your website with useful information and get them on your site where a &quot;buy now&quot; decesion can be made versus having them stay on facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djexothermic</title>
		<link>http://sm4good.com/2009/10/06/why-rss-to-facebook-is-bad-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-24868</link>
		<dc:creator>djexothermic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sm4good.com/?p=418#comment-24868</guid>
		<description>There is still no good option available aside from posting manually. I just tried numerous Facebook applications, and most of them don&#039;t even work. NetworkedBlogs, and a few other apps, work fairly well but everyone of them tries to stick a intermediate step between the Facebook page and the wall post. The simplest option is not available: all I want is for a new blog post to be posted on the Facebook page wall just like if I posted a link. NetworkedBlogs and some others will display the blog post inside a frame with additional garbage, and include unnecessary and distracting links on the wall post. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is still no good option available aside from posting manually. I just tried numerous Facebook applications, and most of them don&#039;t even work. NetworkedBlogs, and a few other apps, work fairly well but everyone of them tries to stick a intermediate step between the Facebook page and the wall post. The simplest option is not available: all I want is for a new blog post to be posted on the Facebook page wall just like if I posted a link. NetworkedBlogs and some others will display the blog post inside a frame with additional garbage, and include unnecessary and distracting links on the wall post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adnan</title>
		<link>http://sm4good.com/2009/10/06/why-rss-to-facebook-is-bad-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-8190</link>
		<dc:creator>Adnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sm4good.com/?p=418#comment-8190</guid>
		<description>I had same experience, but found a solution: RSS - &gt; Feedburner -&gt; Twitter -&gt; Facebook. Same as you posted it manually ;) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had same experience, but found a solution: RSS &#8211; &gt; Feedburner -&gt; Twitter -&gt; Facebook. Same as you posted it manually <img src='http://sm4good.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timoluege</title>
		<link>http://sm4good.com/2009/10/06/why-rss-to-facebook-is-bad-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Timoluege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sm4good.com/?p=418#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Good suggestion, thanks. Does NetworkedBlogs work for any kind of RSS feed? I suppose so. It never occurred to me to use it for non-blog sites but I suppose it should work.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good suggestion, thanks. Does NetworkedBlogs work for any kind of RSS feed? I suppose so. It never occurred to me to use it for non-blog sites but I suppose it should work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Gorley</title>
		<link>http://sm4good.com/2009/10/06/why-rss-to-facebook-is-bad-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Gorley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sm4good.com/?p=418#comment-140</guid>
		<description>How about NetworkedBlogs? It will post all of your blog posts to your blog&#039;s Facebook page, and they look like mini versions of the blog itself. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about NetworkedBlogs? It will post all of your blog posts to your blog&#039;s Facebook page, and they look like mini versions of the blog itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timoluege</title>
		<link>http://sm4good.com/2009/10/06/why-rss-to-facebook-is-bad-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Timoluege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sm4good.com/?p=418#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Thanks Vedran. But, unless I&#039;m missing something, this actually wouldn&#039;t help.  
 
From what I understand it would link the posterous page directly to Facebook on the one hand and to the original post on the other hand. While that is better than the terribly ugly Notes page, it&#039;s worse than adding the posts manually. Because the user would then have to go Farcebook -&gt; Posterous -&gt; ifrc.org. But at the end of the day I want people to go from Facebook to our site directly and not via an additional step. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Vedran. But, unless I&#039;m missing something, this actually wouldn&#039;t help.  </p>
<p>From what I understand it would link the posterous page directly to Facebook on the one hand and to the original post on the other hand. While that is better than the terribly ugly Notes page, it&#039;s worse than adding the posts manually. Because the user would then have to go Farcebook -&gt; Posterous -&gt; ifrc.org. But at the end of the day I want people to go from Facebook to our site directly and not via an additional step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

